Presented for your amusement

[haggholm]

This is a pretty hilarious attempt at logic.

Comments

[renatus.livejournal.com]

It's hilarious and dismaying and I'm pretty sure some of his blithe statements (like that his first premise is the one atheists 'usually' rejct--huh?!) are patently untrue. I only bothered to read down to where he started trying to tie it together, at which point I realized I was reading intellectual masturbation and went to wash my hands.

[kokopellinelli]

I only made it about halfway through that drivel before I shouted, "BUT THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE YOU ASSHOLE" at my computer and stopped reading.

Now my eyes are burning and I have a headache. Thanks.

[metaspective.livejournal.com]

You did far better than me. I got up to, "Now this is a logically airtight argument." At that point I felt like throwing up and had to stop. Some time later I came back and skipped further down to where he discussed the second premise in the hope that he'd somehow acknowledge and resolve the circularity it brings to the argument. I haven't been able to keep anything down since.

[kokopellinelli]

Well, in all fairness, I only actually read the first few paragraphs, then I skimmed the rest, hoping to find the place where he said, "HAHA JUST KIDDING, THIS ISN'T ACTUALLY EARTH LOGIC" only I didn't find that place anywhere. Such a depressing state of affairs.

As for the other, may I suggest Saltines and 7-Up? It always works for me when I'm sick (granted, I'm not sure it will help settle a stomach unsettled by jackassery, but anything's worth a try). ;)

yowzers

[(Anonymous)]

I might be mistaken because I just skimmed the article, but I think at one point e implies that since atheists exist God does not.... I'm not sure if I was using logic to conclude that, or eir particular brand of crazy town logic.

[metaspective.livejournal.com]

I'm astounded that he could believe it's even close to reasonable, let alone "logically airtight"! How could he possibly not realise it's circular?